
Planable is primarily a content approval and collaboration tool — its core pitch is letting teams preview and sign off on posts before they go live, not automating what gets posted in the first place. It does support RSS in a limited way, but understanding exactly what that means is the whole point of this comparison.
Planable’s defining feature is a feed-style interface that previews posts exactly as they’ll appear on each network, so clients or team members can react, comment, and approve without endless email chains or PDF mockups. It supports four approval modes (none, optional, mandatory, multi-level), making it a natural fit for agencies managing client sign-off or in-house teams with a formal review step before anything publishes.
This is the detail worth knowing before assuming Planable does what PostRSS does: Planable’s RSS capability is a bulk import feature, not continuous automation. You can import a batch of items from an RSS feed (similar to a CSV import) to quickly populate your content calendar — useful for teams migrating a large existing content library or seeding a campaign at scale. It is not a “watch this feed and automatically post new items forever” system. Once imported, those items still go through Planable’s normal approval and scheduling workflow like any manually added post.
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | $0 (50 total posts) |
| Basic | $33/workspace/month |
| Pro | $49/workspace/month |
| Enterprise | Custom |
Analytics is a separate $9/month/workspace add-on on top of these tiers. Planable’s Free plan is capped at 50 total posts rather than being ongoing, which is a meaningfully different limit than PostRSS’s Free plan (10 tasks/month, but genuinely ongoing with no lifetime cap).
| Feature | PostRSS | Planable |
|---|---|---|
| RSS handling | Continuous automation | One-time bulk import |
| New feed items post automatically | Yes | No |
| Content approval workflows | No | Yes, 4 modes |
| Client-facing preview/approval | No | Yes, core feature |
| Starting price | $0 (ongoing) / $5 | $0 (50-post cap) / $33 |
| Networks reachable from one feed | 66 networks incl. Fediverse, Asian and team-chat platforms | Varies by plan — check their current list |
Picture a marketing team publishing three blog posts a week. On Planable, someone would periodically re-run the RSS import (or add each post manually), route each through the approval workflow, and schedule the approved ones — a repeatable but hands-on process each time. On PostRSS, once a feed is connected, that same team never touches the pipeline again; each new post detected in the feed is published automatically at the configured targets, with no recurring import step and no approval gate to clear. Neither approach is wrong — they reflect different assumptions about whether every post needs a human checkpoint before it goes live.
Agencies and teams whose core need is a formal, visual approval process — where a client or manager needs to sign off on exactly what will be posted before it goes live — get real value from Planable’s preview-and-approve workflow, and can use its RSS import as a convenient way to seed a content library rather than type everything manually.
If you specifically want new content to post automatically the moment it’s published, with no manual approval step in between, PostRSS does that continuously rather than as a one-time import. The two tools aren’t really substitutes: Planable assumes a human reviews content before it goes live; PostRSS assumes it shouldn’t need to.
Teams considering PostRSS often ask how they keep control if nobody approves each post. The answer is that the control moves from individual posts to rules you set once per source:
In effect, the review happens where the content is written. If an article is fit to publish on your website, it is fit to be announced automatically.
Because the two tools solve different problems, some teams use both: Planable for campaign posts, client work and anything that needs sign-off, and PostRSS for the steady stream of routine content such as new blog posts, product listings or news items. If you do this, give each tool its own job on each social account, so the same article is not published twice. PostRSS’s Free plan, with 10 posts a month to one Facebook Page, is an easy way to test how the automated side fits your workflow before you decide; current plans are on the pricing page.
Based on how Planable documents the feature, RSS import is a batch action you trigger yourself rather than a standing, automatic watch-and-post process — if you need new content to keep flowing in without manually re-importing, that’s a different capability than what Planable’s RSS import provides.
Necessarily, yes — any mandatory approval step means a human has to review and sign off before publishing, which is the intended tradeoff for teams that want that control. PostRSS has no such step by design, publishing as soon as new feed content is detected.
Planable’s Free plan caps at 50 total posts rather than resetting monthly, so it’s better suited to a single small project or trial than an ongoing automated posting need — PostRSS’s Free plan, while smaller in monthly volume, doesn’t have that lifetime ceiling.
PostRSS has no approval step by design. Instead you control publishing with rules set once per source: keyword filters, category feeds, posting windows, message formats and a maximum number of posts per update.
Planable and PostRSS solve genuinely different problems dressed up as similar ones. Planable is built around human review and client approval, with RSS import as a convenience for populating that review queue. PostRSS is built around removing the human step entirely for routine content. If your workflow requires sign-off before anything publishes, Planable’s approval tools are the right fit; if you want new content to post itself without anyone touching it, PostRSS is the more direct tool for that job.
What changed in the networks, what broke, and how to fix it before it costs you reach.
Built by Internet Solutions, the team behind PostRSS. Each product saves you time in its own way.