Updated: August 24, 2026
MeetEdgar built its name on one specific idea: your best social content shouldn't disappear after a single post. Its entire product is organized around category-based evergreen recycling — sort content into buckets, and let Edgar automatically re-share it on a recurring schedule indefinitely. That's a meaningfully different automation philosophy from PostRSS's new-content-triggered model, which makes this comparison less about features and more about which content problem you're actually trying to solve.
MeetEdgar offers two annual plans: Eddie at $24.91/month for freelancers (5 social accounts, 10 weekly automations, 4 content categories, 20 team members) and Edgar at $41.58/month for small businesses (25 accounts, 1,000 automations, unlimited categories, 20 team members), with month-to-month pricing running slightly higher and 30-day free trials on both. Additional social accounts cost $3.99 each on Eddie and $1.99 each on Edgar. Its core mechanism is category-based content recycling: you organize posts into content categories, set a recurring schedule, and Edgar automatically re-shares from each category's library indefinitely, supporting 8+ platforms with AI-powered content generation available as well.
PostRSS is built around one job: watching an RSS or Atom feed and automatically distributing new items to Facebook, X, LinkedIn, Pinterest, and VKontakte the moment they're published. There's no content category system, no recurring-reshare scheduling of old posts — the entire product is triggered by new content appearing in a feed. Pricing starts with a genuine free plan and paid tiers from $5/month.
MeetEdgar's entire design philosophy centers on maximizing the lifetime value of content you've already created — a strong post from a year ago keeps circulating through your social feeds via its category system, on the logic that most of your audience never saw it the first time around, and even those who did generally don't mind seeing genuinely good content again. PostRSS's model is built around the opposite assumption: that your source feed continuously produces new content worth distributing immediately, and the job is getting that new content out fast and reliably, not resurfacing what's already been shared. Neither approach is wrong; they solve genuinely different problems, and the right choice depends entirely on whether your content situation looks like a steady stream of new material or a valuable archive worth recirculating.
| Capability | MeetEdgar | PostRSS |
|---|---|---|
| RSS-triggered auto-posting | Not the core mechanism | The entire product |
| Evergreen content recycling | Included, the platform's signature feature | Not included — new-content focused |
| Category-based content organization | Included | Not included |
| AI content generation | Included | Not included |
| Platform count | 8+ networks | 5 platforms (including VKontakte) |
| Entry price | $24.91/month (Eddie, annual) | Free plan; paid from $5/month |
| Tier | MeetEdgar | PostRSS |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 30-day trial only; no permanent free tier | Free plan (1 target, Facebook page) |
| Entry paid | $24.91/month (Eddie, 5 accounts) | $5/month (Start, 1 target) |
| Mid | $41.58/month (Edgar, 25 accounts, 1,000 automations) | $10–$40/month (Professional / Ultimate) |
| Top tier | Additional accounts scale incrementally ($1.99–$3.99 each) | $100–$2,500/month (Enterprise, up to 5,000 targets) |
See our full pricing breakdown for current PostRSS tiers.
For an account with a substantial archive of still-relevant content — evergreen tips, timeless resources, product information that doesn't go stale — MeetEdgar's recycling engine extracts ongoing value from that archive automatically, something PostRSS's new-content-only model doesn't attempt. Its category system also gives teams a structured way to balance content types (promotional, educational, curated) across a recurring schedule, useful for accounts that want a consistent content mix without manually rebalancing it each week.
For a publisher whose actual need is getting brand-new content distributed the moment it exists — a news site, an active blog, a business publishing frequent updates — PostRSS's feed-triggered model delivers that directly, where MeetEdgar's recycling-first design isn't built around immediacy for new items. It also includes VKontakte, absent from MeetEdgar's network list, and its per-target pricing tends to undercut MeetEdgar's per-account model at smaller scale.
Ask whether your bigger opportunity is squeezing more value out of content you've already published, or reliably getting new content out the moment it's ready. Accounts with a substantial evergreen archive and infrequent new content get real value from MeetEdgar's recycling model. Publishers with a steady stream of genuinely new content get more direct value from PostRSS's immediate, feed-triggered distribution.
Setting up MeetEdgar means organizing existing and future content into categories, then configuring how often and in what sequence each category recirculates — a genuinely different setup task than connecting a live feed. PostRSS's setup is scoped narrowly: connect a feed, choose target platforms, and new items publish automatically from that point on, with no category structure to build.
Some publishers genuinely benefit from running both models in parallel rather than choosing one exclusively — PostRSS handling new content the moment it's published, while MeetEdgar's category system separately recirculates a curated selection of evergreen posts on its own recurring schedule. Because the two tools solve non-overlapping problems (new content vs. archive recirculation), running them together doesn't create redundant posting as long as the source content for each is kept distinct.
A coaching business with a library of 200 evergreen tip posts. This is exactly the situation MeetEdgar's category system was built for — sort those 200 posts into a handful of categories, set a recurring schedule, and let them circulate indefinitely without any of the manual re-scheduling that would otherwise be required to keep that valuable archive working. PostRSS offers nothing for this specific need, since it only reacts to new feed items.
A daily news publisher. Here immediacy is everything — a story from last week has little ongoing value compared to one published an hour ago. PostRSS's instant, feed-triggered distribution fits this directly; MeetEdgar's recurring-category model, built around resurfacing older content, would actively work against a publisher whose value is entirely in freshness.
A small business with both a blog and a decent-sized archive of older, still-useful posts. This business likely benefits from both tools operating independently: PostRSS distributing new blog posts the moment they publish, and a recycling tool like MeetEdgar separately keeping older, evergreen posts circulating on their own schedule — two different content lifecycles handled by two different automation models.
It's tempting to compare MeetEdgar and PostRSS purely on price, but that comparison misses the more important variable: what kind of content you actually have. A tool built for evergreen recycling adds little value to a fast-moving news feed, and a tool built for immediate new-content distribution adds little value to a static archive with no new material being produced. Before comparing monthly cost, it's worth honestly assessing whether your content situation is "steady stream of new material" or "valuable archive that deserves a longer life" — the answer determines which tool's core mechanism actually fits, independent of which one is cheaper.
MeetEdgar can pull from an RSS feed into its category system, but its core strength and design center on recurring evergreen recycling rather than immediate, new-item-triggered publishing; PostRSS's entire product is built around that specific immediate trigger.
Technically yes, but you'd be paying for a platform whose entire value proposition and pricing are built around the recycling engine, without using its primary differentiator.
Because news and frequently-updated content loses relevance quickly; PostRSS's immediate, feed-triggered distribution gets new items out while they're timely, rather than fitting them into a recurring recycling schedule built for evergreen material.
No — PostRSS is intentionally scoped to new-content distribution only. Evergreen recycling would need a separate tool if that's part of your content strategy.
Both, potentially — PostRSS for reliable new-content distribution and MeetEdgar (or a similar recycling tool) for extracting ongoing value from the archive, run as two separate, non-conflicting automations.
No, VKontakte isn't part of MeetEdgar's supported network list. If VKontakte reach matters for your audience, PostRSS supports it directly.
MeetEdgar charges $1.99–$3.99 per additional account depending on plan, while PostRSS's plans are structured around target and task allowances that scale by tier; the better value depends on exactly how many accounts and how much posting volume you actually need.
MeetEdgar and PostRSS both automate posting but solve fundamentally different content problems. MeetEdgar maximizes the lifetime value of content you already have through recurring recycling; PostRSS gets brand-new content distributed the moment it exists. If your bigger opportunity is your archive, MeetEdgar's recycling engine reflects real value. If your bigger opportunity is reliably distributing what you're creating right now, PostRSS delivers that outcome directly, without asking you to build a category system around content that doesn't need recycling in the first place.
